Is it correct to say there are a lot of people?

Sommario:

1. Is it correct to say there are a lot of people?
2. Is it there were a lot of people or there was a lot of people?
3. Are there a lot or is there a lot?
4. Is it more people or many people?
5. Which is correct lots of people or lot of people?
6. Are people correct?
7. Was or were with there?
8. Is a lot plural?
9. Which is correct there is more or there are more?
10. Is it to many more or too many more?
11. Can I say too much people?
12. What is the difference between alot of and lots of?
13. Is there any difference between a lot of and lots of?
14. Is it wrong to say peoples?
15. When can we use a people?
16. Was or were after there?
17. Is a lot of you singular or plural?
18. Is more plural or singular?
19. Why do we put S?

Is it correct to say there are a lot of people?

Don't be misled by the apparent singular collective noun "a lot," which is treated like "many" when followed by a plural noun. There are a lot of people = there are many people.

Is it there were a lot of people or there was a lot of people?

Senior Member. "There were a lot of people" is the only option that is considered formally correct - of course, in speaking we might say "There was..." (we do this regardless of the "a lot", but more frequently in the present : "There's two books on the table") - but this is not considered "correct".

Are there a lot or is there a lot?

Mostly, we will use “There are a lot of” with countable nouns, when we discuss plurals, and “There is a lot of” with uncountable nouns, but there is of course flexibility here – in many cases it may be down to the individual's interpretation of the sentence. There are a lot of apples.

Is it more people or many people?

They are both correct. Many people = a large number of people. Most people = a majority of the population.

Which is correct lots of people or lot of people?

a lot of and lots of have the same meaning: they both mean a large amount or number of people or things. They are both used before countable nouns and uncountable nouns: with countable nouns: A lot of people went to the game.

Are people correct?

People vs. Peoples—What's the Difference? Most of the time, people is the correct word to choose as a plural for person. ... Peoples is only necessary when you refer to distinct ethnic groups (for example, within the same region).

Was or were with there?

There was is used when you refer to one thing or person. There were is used when you refer to more than one thing or person.

Is a lot plural?

By extension, it means "a large number/quantity of things/people". It behaves like the noun it refers to. If that is a plural noun, a lot is plural; if there is no noun (as in your first example), a lot is singular because it means "a large amount". In the third example it means "many of our players".

Which is correct there is more or there are more?

The choice between the phrases there is and there are at the beginning of a sentence is determined by the noun that follows it. Use there is when the noun is singular (“There is a cat”). Use there are when the noun is plural (“There are two cats”).

Is it to many more or too many more?

Too much, too many with a noun We often use too before much and many. It means 'more than necessary'. We can use too much before an uncountable noun and too many before a plural noun, or without a noun when the noun is obvious: I bought too much food.

Can I say too much people?

It should be too many people to be grammatically correct. It implies a negative opinion about the number of people more so than that the number is too big to count.

What is the difference between alot of and lots of?

Both expressions are used in English and have the same meaning. They both mean a large amount of either people or things. ... A 'lot' as used in the expression 'a lot of' and 'lots of' refers to a unit of something or an amount of units or a parcel that is offered together as one complete unit.

Is there any difference between a lot of and lots of?

Lots of is more informal than a lot of. A lot of and lots of can both be used with plural countable nouns and with singular uncountable nouns for affirmatives, negatives, and questions: We've got lots of things to do. That's a lot of money.

Is it wrong to say peoples?

Most of the time, people is the correct word to choose as a plural for person. Persons is archaic, and it is safe to avoid using it, except in legal writing, which has its own traditional language. Peoples is only necessary when you refer to distinct ethnic groups (for example, within the same region).

When can we use a people?

Many usage guides over the years have suggested that there is a clear distinction between these two words; people is used when referring to a collective group or indeterminate number, and persons serves better when referring to individuals (or a number of individuals).

Was or were after there?

There was – requires a SINGULAR NOUN. There were – requires a PLURAL NOUN.

Is a lot of you singular or plural?

By extension, it means "a large number/quantity of things/people". It behaves like the noun it refers to. If that is a plural noun, a lot is plural; if there is no noun (as in your first example), a lot is singular because it means "a large amount". In the third example it means "many of our players".

Is more plural or singular?

When “more than one” modifies a singular noun, it goes with a singular verb: “More than one person is going.” But when it's followed by “of” and a plural noun, it takes a plural verb: “More than one of the people are going.”

Why do we put S?

Use an apostrophe followed by "s" ('s) to show that a singular noun belongs to someone or something. ... Use an "S" followed by an apostrophe (s') to show possession of plural nouns or nouns that always end in "s." Using S' to Show Possession. This sentence is comparing the two rooms used by the boys and the girls.